Choosing Training Models for Your Training and Hiring Needs.
Navigation: Index Page | < Previous Chapter | Next Chapter >

As a result of the many changes in the workplace brought about by modern technologies and new knowledge in personnel development, many training methods are continuously being introduced. Personnel development consulting firms promising solutions to various employee training issues are becoming popular and training models are made available, even via the Internet.

Training models differ in terms of method, but all of them are intended to promote employee and organizational efficiency. Companies, however, have to be analytical in deciding which model to apply. On the job training is one of the popular models among companies looking for competent employees for vacant positions. Another model involves making candidates undergo test jobs.

Between the two, on the job training is better at getting accurate assessments of an applicant’s potential to perform well in the job because it is more comprehensive and covers longer periods. Usually, close supervision and mentoring are extended as candidates carry out actual jobs where major mistakes can cost the company money and time. Companies often offer on the job trainings to new graduates with possible absorption of trainees who have displayed competence and are able to mix well with employees.

Test jobs are ordinarily short term and are more focused on the ability of an applicant or employee to perform specific tasks. Less mentoring and supervision are provided, as they are just meant to gauge the trainees’ know-how and potential. The scope of training can come in the form of either theoretical tests or practical tests. The materials used in practical tests are mostly simulations of actual jobs. Examples of test jobs are driving tests, computer operation tests, and model teaching sessions. The objectives of test jobs are two-fold: to measure present competence and determine weaknesses and strengths from which to base decisions for hiring or for giving additional training inputs.

While training test jobs offer limited inputs, the process gives candidates a lot of benefits because after the test, jobs trainers offer tips and recommendations on how to improve performance next time. For companies needing people for immediate hiring, test jobs can be very helpful.

Both models have their strong points. But on the job trainings can offer a lot more benefits to prospective employees as well as the employers. Since it covers a much longer period than job test trainings, more inputs are offered, which are immediately put into practice in an actual work setting. Furthermore, the scope is broader. Applicants undergoing on the job trainings have the opportunity to acclimatize or accustom themselves with the atmosphere of the workplace and learn to adjust to its peculiarities.

Test job trainings are particularly useful for companies looking for immediate hiring. Combine with other training tests, it can be very effective in the search for the most qualified candidate available. It has other uses as well, like equipping a particular employee with specific skill, which he is expected to apply in his job. It can be used in assessing the skills of employees on jobs that could be used in upgrading existing training programs. Companies can use either model, depending on the objectives they like to accomplish.